Use of Elevator to the circumference Leg edema,
comfort and functionality in Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFU)
Mayusef
Sukmana *, Sagiran **, Falasifah Ani Yuniarti **
* Students of Master program
of Nursing in Muhammadiyah University
** Lecturer Master program
of Nursing in St. Muhammadiyah University
South ringroad Street.
Village Taman Tirta, Bantul City Daerah
Istimewa Yogyakarta Indonesia
Phone. 0274-387656
Email:
200801sukmana@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
Background:
Edema of the DFU occur due to failure of venous return. The angle of elevation of the lower limb major effect on
venous return. ERLESS (Edema Reduction Elevator Leg Stainless Steel) is
designed as an elevator leg considering angle accuracy and comfort. The
research objective to analyze the effect of lower extremity elevation angle of
30 ° using the circumference ERLESS edema, comfort and functionality on the
client ERLESS DFUS. Methods:
quasy experiment, the approach pre post test control group design, sample of
respondents 28 clients and 28 nurses. Engineering samples using
consecutive sampling. Respondents nurse put ERLESS at 30 ° elevation
treatment group and the control group with a pillow for 30 minutes. After
the elevation of all groups measured circumference edema. The treatment
group ERLESS comfort clients fill out a questionnaire and nurses filled out
questionnaires ERLESS function. Statistical test paired t-test,
Independent sample t-test and One Sample t-test and multiple linear regression.
Results: Circumference edema
control group of 30 ° and the value of p = 0.001. Edema circumference
difference of 30 ° with the control group p = 0.035. Leisure group
ERLESS 30 ° p = 0.005, p = 0.001 ERLESS function. Conclusions: age, albumin, old wounds,
history of diabetes affect the circumference decrease edema. Elevation
of 30 ° using ERLESS more comfortable than the circumference of pillows and
able to reduce edema. Researchers advised to do research at different
angles.
Keywords:
Elevation of the lower limb, edema circumference, Comfort, Function ERLESS,
Diabetic Foot Ulcers.
PRELIMINARY
Diabetic
foot ulcers (DFU) is one of the most serious complication of diabetes mellitus
clients. The incidence of diabetes mellitus DFU client reach 4% and 10% with
the future life expectancy of 25% (Armstrong & Lipsky, 2005). DM patients
as much as 20% with complications DFU having trouble extension of infection,
gangrene, amputation and death. The other problem is healing
old wounds that will likely end up with an amputation, it will affect the
quality of life and increased mortality (Yazdanpanah, Nasiri, & Adarvishi,
2015; Nabuurs-Franssen & Kruseman, 2005). An important factor of the
problem is the length of wound healing (Yotsu, 2014). Healing old wounds
resulting in the length of hospitalization.
The
duration of wound healing is affected by edema complicating factor. Edema of
the feet found in clients over 50 years of age are caused by venous
insufficiency. Venous insufficiency affects more than 30% of the
population and 1% occur in heart failure (Ely, Osheroff, Chambliss, &
Ebell, 2006). Cases of venous insufficiency there is lots of diabetes
mellitus with complications DFU with clinical manifestations appear is the
occurrence of edema.
Edema
resulting in a decline in the exchange of substances between the blood and
cells. Interstitial fluid accumulation causes are wide gap between blood
cells and to transmit nutrients, oxygen and waste materials so that the
diffusion speed is reduced and the resulting cells in tissue edema have less
blood supply (Sherwood, 2015). Poor blood supply can inhibit wound healing.
Even edema were not addressed will potentially damage the skin tissue due to
dilatation of intracellular and tissue edema pain and more susceptible to
injury when compared to normal tissue (Kozier, 2011).
Leg edema
due to the failure of venous return when the leg under and dependent (Kawasaki,
2013). Edema in DFU can be reduced by changing the position of the elevation
feet (Sims, 1986; Ho, Leigh, & Tsui, 2013). Changes in position when the
foot dielevasikan aims will improve venous return and reduce pressure on the
veins (FP Dix, 2005). According to Seeley, 2004 in (Wulandari, 2015) elevation
of the lower extremities is useful to restore blood flow and reduce pressure at
the distal extremities. Activities over 15 minutes with foot pointing down when
walking or hanging leg could increase pressure to distal by 20%, thereby
increasing the risk of peripheral edema. Peripheral edema distal area will
increase pressure and reduces arterial perfusion due to compression. Lower
extremity elevation can reduce the pressure, and the expected effect is the
increase in the wound healing process DFU (Wulandari, 2015). Intervention edema
in the context of wound healing with elevation recommended also by The
Australian Wound Management Association for the elevation will improve
microcirculation and decrease edema in the legs (National Pressure Ulcer
Advisory Panel, 2014).
Wound care
hospitals performed Abdul Wahab Sjahranie and hospitals IAMoeis using pillows
to reduce edema have limitations in accuracy desired elevation angle, so the
results are not optimal. Angle accuracy is affected by the difference between
the angle of the extremities to the heart. When the legs to the heart at an
angle of 90 °. This angle gives the power of 100% gravity, at an
angle of 45 ° provides 71% power of gravity and the leg horizontal
position (angle of 0 °) the strength of the gravitational force is
0% (Starkey, 2004). The influence of the angle of elevation of the venous
return very big role, it is necessary to use leg braces instrument capable
of accurately set the elevation angles. Accurate elevation angle restore
effective venous return so as to decrease the edema in DFU clients. In a
previous study that recommended the elevation angle is 30 °, 45 °, 60 ° and 90
° (MY Liaw, 1989).
ERLESS
(Edema Reduction Stainless Steel Leg Elevator) is one leg braces designed
by researchers in order to leg edema can dielevasikan with accurate angle
setting affects the peripheral venous pressure flow to the heart. The design is
to consider the convenience factor and security for clients using and nurses
who put it up. Kolcaba Comfort as one of the nursing theory concepts
developed the theory of comfort that includes physical comfort, psychospiritual
and comfortable environment. Interventions designed to help clients maintain or
restore physical function and comfort, prevent complications, restoring comfort
due to pain (Alligood, 2014). In a previous study felt most comfortable angle
is 30 ° position for 30 minutes. This angle gives a pressure drop (off-loading)
on the wound (MY Liaw, 1989).
ERLESS
also has safety criteria currently used. The design of the tools used must
consider the risk of injury to the client (Yoga, 2013). ERLESS materials are
directly in contact with the client leg skin made of soft material so that the
pressure interface can be minimized.The
decrease edema can be evaluated through several methods include: measuring depth
and recovery pitting edema, measuring 8 places on foot,
using water displacement measurements, measurements with modified
edema tester, assessment questionnaires and circumference measurements.
The results of the reviews indicate measurements circumference at
the ankle and the water displacement method is the most accurate
measurement (Brodovicz et al., 2009; Kogo, Higashi, and Murata, 2015; Legare,
Gammal, Hall, & Horwitz, 2007) Other studies also recommend measurement
ankle circumference as a method of evaluation of edema (Mora, 2002).
This circumference measurement is the most practical method, easy, fast
and accurate (Simon, 2014).
The
research objective of this study to analyze the effect of lower limb elevation
at an angle of 30 ° using the circumference ERLESS edema, comfort
and functionality on the client ERLESS DFU. Specific Objectives of this study
are as follows:
a.
Identify the characteristics of the
treatment group, the control, comfort and functionality ERLESS.
b.
Analyze differences in circumference
measurements before and after the group elevation angle of 30 ° and a control
group.
c.
Analyzing the effect of elevation
differences in the group with an angle of 30 ° and a control group against edema
circumference measurement.
d.
Analyzing the effect of using ERLESS
against DFU client convenience.
e.
Analyzing ERLESS function.
Diabetic
Foot Ulcers (DFU) is an open wound in the skin layer to the dermis, which
usually occurs in the feet because of macrovascular and microvascular
dysfunction and damage tissue perfusion in diabetes mellitus. DFU can be
divided into: neuropathic ulcers, ischemic ulcers and ulcer neuroischaemic
(Paul et al., 2013). Edema is swelling caused by the increased volume of
fluid in the interstitial cavity (Ely et al., 2006). According to Starkey
(2004) edema is excess fluid in the interstitial space due to an imbalance of
pressure outside and inside the cell membrane or due to blockage of lymph
channels and failure mechanisms of venous return.
Nursing
assessment on clients with diabetic foot include the assessment of lower limb
movement, moisture, color, temperature, edema, pain and sensation in the feet (Aalaa,
Malazy, Sanjari, & Peimani, 2012). DM neuropathy in time will result in arteriovenous
shunting, resulting in dilation of the veins and venous distension
generates feet and has a tendency to swell (Rebolledo, Soto, Escobedo, and
Peña, 2011).
Management
of edema in the form of elevation using gravity to increase the venous and
lymphatic flow from the legs. The hydrostatic pressure occurs because gravity
is blood in the blood vessels. Peripheral venous and arterial pressure is
influenced by gravity. Higher blood vessels from the heart of gravity will
increase and decrease the pressure, thereby reducing peripheral edema (Villeco
& Otr, 2012).
The
effectiveness of the force of gravity returns blood to the heart are influenced
by several factors as follows:
a.
Angle extremity to the surface
(Starkey, 2004).
b.
Venous Diameter (Irawati, 2010). Age
effect on vein diameter, the more we age, the structure of blood vessels
undergo changes menebalny a narrowing of the blood vessel wall lumen diameter,
changes in endothelial function and stiffness (Byung & Young, 2010).
c.
Normally liquid viscosity is
constant, but after the injury, increased blood viscosity due to loss of
plasma coming into the surrounding tissue, and dissolved composition to be
larger than the solvent (Starkey, 2004) .Viskositas influenced by the speed of
blood flow, when the blood flow is slow then the viscosity be high (Irawati,
2010).
ERLESS
is a tool used foot buffer on the client having trouble nursing excess fluid
volume (Herdman & Kamitsuru, 2014). The purpose of this tool is to
increase the use of reverse flow leg vein into the right atrium to be more
effective with angle settings that cause the effects of gravity and increase
the comfort of the client through the reduction of pressure on the wound.
Therapeutic off -loading reduce pressure on DFU area thus reducing pain.
ERLESS have some security indicators as follows: Safe from germ transmission
medium. Do not disturb the mobility of the joint motion sedentary patients. No
cause new sores. Do not disturb the wound healing. Tools designed to avoid injury.
Tool easily in disassembly, carry and disinfected. Tool safe from the
possibility of pressure ulcers. According to (Simon, 2014) Elevation 30
° provided on foot will make the distribution of pressure on the body be moved,
the pressure on the heel decreases the load. (Supriya et al., 2014). According
to the National Pressure Ulcer Adisory Panel, the European Pressure Ulcers
Advisory Panel and the Pan Pacific Pressure Injury aliances (2014)
elevation of the heel can prevent the risk of pressure ulcers on the
heel because the pressure will be distributed. Interface pressure that
occurs during the elevation of the sacrum is measured using indicators
Q. Palm ERLESS appliance is safe to use if the interface pressure less
than 50 mmHg (Supriya et al., 2014).
On
the client DFU pain is a significant threat to the comfort of the client. The
cause of pain in DFU pressure is the pressure that occurs in the wound
(Wulandari, 2015). Nursing interventions have the goal of increasing a sense of
comfort. Intervention comfort has three categories: standard comfort
interventions for improving recovery of physical function, including
hemodynamic physiologic body (Aligood, 2014). Physical recovery by stabilizing
the hemodynamic done by elevation to increase cardiac output (Monnet,
Richard, & Teboul, 2015).
RESEARCH METHODS
This
research is a quasi experiment with pretest-posttest control design.
Comparing the effect of lower extremity elevation using the circumference
ERLESS DFU edema in the treatment group (using ERLESS angle of 30 °) and
control (pillow). Population taken in the room Flamboyan Hospital A. Wahab
Sjahranie Samarinda and the Karang Asam Hospital Lounge IA Moeis Samarinda.
Sampling (sampling) of the respondents client and nurse respondents in
this study with consecutive sampling method for 8 weeks with a total
sample of 28 respondents 28 respondents clients and nurses. The samples were
included in the group of respondents clients elevation of 30 ° and control is
done by simple random sampling. The samples were nurses in the group of
respondents installation elevation angle of 30 ° or pillows also use simple
random sampling. Members of the population comes from clients who meet the
inclusion criteria are given the choice of therapy using the elevation
extremity edema below 30 ° or using a pillow.
The
inclusion criteria respondents client is determined as follows: Willing to
become a respondent, can read and write, clients diabetes mellitus with edema
and wound gangrene, Grade 1 to 5 using a scale WAGNER, DFU types of neuropathic
ulcers, clients with edema lower extremity, inspection depth and recovery
edema with a value of 2 to 4. exclusion criteria included: the client is
experiencing lower limb amputations, diabetes mellitus with complications of
heart failure and abnormal renal function. Clients DFU types of ischemic
ulcers (arterial ulcers) and neuroischaemic. The inclusion criteria
respondents nurses willing to become respondents, Nursing D3 minimal education,
work period of more than two months. Exclusion criteria: 1 month new work,
education SPK.
The
instrument used to perform elevation is by ERLESS. To measure the convenience
of use ERLESS questionnaire ERLESS comfort. To measure Function Function
Questionnaire ERLESS is ERLESS. Both questionnaires are designed researchers
who have been tested for validity and reliability. The results of the
questionnaire Cronbach alpha test ERLESS comfort with value α 0730 and
Function questionnaire ERLESS value α 0643.
Treatment
and control groups who have met the inclusion criteria before the examination provided
informed concent, clients who choose elevation with a pillow included in
the control group, clients who choose elevation of 30 ° in the group of 30 °.
Respondents were nurses who had given informed concent given the option
of doing elevation angle of 30 ° or pillows. After the nurses were given an
explanation and practice ERLESS installation procedure room. After fulfilling
the ability to install ERLESS, along with the nurse respondents researchers
ERLESS installation on the client.
Respondents
clients who have provided informed concent do pre-test
measurement of edema. Respondents who chose the elevation of 30 ° was installed
ERLESS by nurse respondents who chose 30 ° and in the group I (a) treatment of
the elevation angle of 30 °. Respondents who chose elevation with a pillow
included in the control group was given elevation using a pillow. Prior to
treatment with the installation process is assigned ERLESS or pillow, do ABI
measurement, assessment of injury and edema, and the wound was treated first.
In the treatment group, for the treatment of wounds progresses, the nurse did
respondents foot elevation. After completion of wound care measured the
circumference of ankle edema in the same spot. Then the angle of elevation is
done in accordance with the treatment groups for 30 minutes. In the control
group, respondents do wound assessment, wound care measurement such as edema
and standards applicable in the room, after 30 minutes then do ankle
circumference measurements at the same location. During the install ERLESS
nurse nurse observation ERLESS security installation with a guide ERLESS
Security Observation check list. During the 30-minute elevation will review
client complaints of possible discomfort, leg cramps, cold, cyanosis of the
legs, the small and weak pulse. Monitoring the pulse rate and oxygen saturation
using pulse oxymetri mounted on toes. After completing the
treatment and circumference measurement data obtained edema,
respondents clients in both treatment groups were given a questionnaire
containing about comfort ERLESS containing variable comfort. Respondents nurse
who installed ERLESS also given questionnaires ERLESS function.
Processing
and data analysis method in this research is the analysis of univariate each of
the variables include: respondents clients include age, sex, occupation,
education, long suffering from diabetes and long-suffering DFU, the value of
GDS, the value of albumin, a scale of Wagner and convenience of use tool
ERLESS. ERLESS function of frequency distribution data. Test data normality
using Shapiro - Wilk, edema circumference statistical tests
before and after using a paired t-test and two different test groups circumference
difference edema using independent sample t-test. Statistical
test ERLESS comfort and functionality using one-sample t-test. Linear
regression test was conducted to see research confounding variables that
most influence on the dependent variable circumference edema.
This
research has been worth the ethics test number 093 / EP-FKIK-UMY / III / 2016
of the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine and Health
Sciences, University of Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. This study was approved by the
Hospital Director AWS Samarinda letter number 070 547 / Dikl-Quality / II /
2016 and Director of Hospital IA Moeis Samarinda number 070/350 / RSUD.IAM /
2016.
RESULTS
- The frequency distribution characteristics of respondents clients by age, As Blood Sugar, albumin, long suffering from diabetes, old wounds and Wagner scale.
Table the frequency distribution
characteristics of respondents
|
30
|
Pillow
|
|||
|
mean ± SD
|
min-mak
|
mean ± SD
|
min-mak
|
|
|
Age
|
50.42
± 6:41
|
39-61
|
57.5
± 9:21
|
37-74
|
|
GDS
|
191.36
± 63.61
|
70-312
|
163.5
± 28.63
|
110-208
|
|
Alb
|
3:05
± 0:34
|
2.3
-3.6
|
3:07
± 0:28
|
2.60-3.70
|
|
old DM
|
4:28
± 2.84
|
1-10
|
7:14
± 6:58
|
2-4
|
|
old
wounds
|
1:07
± 0.67
|
0.5-3
|
1.92
± 1:38
|
0.5-5
|
|
Wagner
|
3:14
± 0:53
|
2-4
|
2:29
± 0:46
|
2-3
|
Source: Primary Data 2016
- Frequency distribution client using ERLESS to comforting
Data frequency distribution characteristics of respondents
clients using ERLESS will be presented in tabular form as shown below:
Table results The frequency
distribution of the use of comfort ERLESS elevation angle of 30 ° n = 14
|
Statement
|
SS
|
S
|
TS
|
STS
|
Σ
|
%
|
|||||
|
n
|
%
|
n
|
%
|
n
|
%
|
n
|
%
|
||||
|
1.
|
The client's perception, a strong
supporting tool.
|
7
|
50
|
7
|
50
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
14
|
100
|
|
2.
|
Perception client tool is easy to
use nurse.
|
3
|
21.4
|
11
|
78.6
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
14
|
100
|
|
3.
|
Clients are comfortable and not
worried about falling.
|
4
|
28.6
|
10
|
71.4
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
14
|
100
|
|
4.
|
Pain is felt in the wound
increases.
|
1
|
7.1
|
2
|
14.3
|
8
|
57.1
|
3
|
21.4
|
14
|
100
|
|
5.
|
Thighs, legs and the injured area
more comfortable.
|
3
|
21.4
|
10
|
71.4
|
1
|
7.1
|
0
|
0
|
14
|
100
|
|
6.
|
Worried fall.
|
1
|
7.1
|
0
|
0
|
11
|
78.6
|
2
|
14.3
|
14
|
100
|
|
7.
|
Practical tool.
|
5
|
35.7
|
9
|
64.3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
14
|
100
|
|
8.
|
Fatigue in the limbs.
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
10
|
71.4
|
4
|
28.6
|
14
|
100
|
Sources: Primary data 2016
- The frequency distribution of the votes Function ERLESS
The
frequency distribution table function ERLESS n = 14
|
Statement
|
SS
|
S
|
TS
|
STS
|
Σ
|
%
|
|||||
|
n
|
%
|
n
|
%
|
n
|
%
|
n
|
%
|
||||
|
1.
|
Assist the work of nurses, reduce
edema
|
12
|
42.9
|
16
|
57.1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
28
|
100
|
|
2.
|
During the foot propped nurse
noticed clients feel comfortable.
|
7
|
25
|
21
|
75
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
28
|
100
|
|
3.
|
Tool helps to keep the foot can
dielevasikan 30 °
|
4
|
14.3
|
24
|
85.7
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
28
|
100
|
|
4.
|
Assessment tools can decrease
edema nurse.
|
10
|
35.7
|
18
|
64.3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
28
|
100
|
|
5.
|
Practical tool to use.
|
10
|
35.7
|
18
|
64.3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
28
|
100
|
|
6.
|
Affordable tool procurement.
|
2
|
7.1
|
21
|
75
|
5
|
17.9
|
0
|
0
|
28
|
100
|
Sources: Primary data 2016
- circumference measurements edema before and after elevation of 30 ° and elevation control group.
Table analysis circumference
difference before and after elevation
|
n
|
Mean ±
SD
|
Differences Mean ± SD
|
CI 95%
|
P
|
||
|
circumference
|
||||||
|
30 °
|
Before
|
14
|
26
314 ± 3563
|
1192
± 0708
|
1602-0783
|
0001
|
|
After
|
14
|
25
121 ± 3660
|
||||
|
control
|
Before
|
14
|
23
971 ± 2234
|
0664 ± 0270
|
0820-0508
|
0001
|
|
After
|
14
|
23
307 ± 2235
|
||||
Sources:
Primary data 2016
- 30 ° elevation difference of influence and control over the circumference measurement of edema.
Table
Analysis of differences influence of elevation of 30 °
and
control of the circumference edema
|
dependent
|
elevation
|
Difference
mean
|
CI 95%
|
p
|
|
|
circumference edema
|
30
°
|
0528
|
1017
- (- 0040)
|
0035
|
|
|
Control
|
-0528
|
-0400
- (- 1:01)
|
|||
Sources: Primary data 2016
- ERLESS use your influence on client convenience.
Table Analysis client convenience
using ERLESS
|
Test Value
= 24
|
|||||
|
t
|
df
|
the mean difference
|
CI 95%
|
p
|
|
|
30 °
|
3,371
|
13
|
1.64286
|
2695 -0590
|
0 .005
|
Sources: Primary data 2016
On
the use ERLESS an angle of 30 ° p value = 0.005, this shows that
the installation ERLESS at an angle of 30 ° effect on comfort. Qualitative
comparison between elevation pillow and ERLESS, clients say more happy and
comfortable using ERLESS compared with pillows. At the time of ERLESS used, the
client says that the legs as a whole can be supported without any parts hanging
and without fear there is a shift to the left or right foot while using a
pillow that are hanging on the knee so that clients feel less comfortable.
- ERLESS function.
Table
Analysis of the respondents' assessment of the function ERLESS nurse.
|
Test Value
= 18
|
|||||
|
t
|
df
|
the mean difference
|
CI 95%
|
p
|
|
|
30 °
|
3915
|
27
|
1,321
|
2013-0629
|
0001
|
Sources: Primary data 2016
DISCUSSION
This
study aimed to analyze the effect of lower extremity elevation to the circumference
decrease edema, comfort and functionality ERLESS.
- Characteristics of Respondents
The average age of the control group
and the treatment in this study was relatively similar, at 53 years old. Edema
of the feet found in clients over 50 years of age are caused by venous
insufficiency while there are many cases of venous insufficiency in
clients with diabetes mellitus who developed complications DFU the clinical
manifestations appear is edema (Ely et al., 2006). Average Blood Sugar When
(GDS) of each group is 173 mg / dl. GDS high causing endothelial damage and
blood vessel walls in the form of a thickening of the basement membrane,
thereby causing impaired capillary physiology release of protein and platelets
resulting in decreased tissue oncotic pressure and the occurrence of local
edema (Hidayat, 2000).
Albumin in both treatment groups was
relatively similar to the average 3:05. Albumin is a major protein that affects
the colloid osmotic pressure of plasma maintaining excessive spending
insterstitial capillaries into space so that it can control the volume of
plasma (Sherwood, 2015). History of diabetes in the group of 30 ° elevation
with an average value of 4.2 years, whereas in the control group with an
average value of 7:14 years. History of diabetes over 5 years will lead to
microangiopathy. On the change of conditions mikroangiopati endothelial
basement membrane becomes thickened, not elastic and easy to leak plasma protein
(Hidayat, 2000). Thickening of the basement membrane will increase capillary
hydrostatic pressure (Veves, Giurini, & Logerfo, 2006).
Old wounds there are differences in
the three groups. The average length of the wound in groups of 30 ° is 1:07 months
and 1.92 months in the control group. Old wounds are closely related to the
inflammatory process. In inflammatory inflammatory mediators such as histamine,
prostaglandins, bradykinin is released and causes increased capillary
permeability and capillary hydrostatic pressure increases, it will increase the
accumulation of fluid in the interstitial (Jeyakhanthan, 2006). Wagner scale
group obtained 30 ° has the highest scale is 3.14. Wagner scale shows the
breadth and depth layers of the wound. Inflammatory mediators during the injury
occurred will cause an increase in capillary walls which allows more plasma
proteins out of the capillaries into insterstisium fluid through the
capillary pores dilation triggered by histamine in tissue injury
(Sherwood, 2015; Starkey, 2004).
- Differences in circumference measurements before and after the group elevation angle of 30 ° and a control group.
The results showed groups of 30 °
greater losses than the control group. Previous research also showed
differences decrease edema at an angle of 30 °, 45 °, 60 ° and 90 ° (MY Liaw,
1989). Circumference edema is closely related to the skin
covering the circumference of the ankle. The skin can swell if there is an
accumulation of fluid in the interstitial space (Sherwood, 2015). The effect of
gravity when the elevation of 30 minutes will reduce peripheral venous
pressure, interstitial fluid into the veins and into venous circulation. The
pace of decline is strongly influenced by the elevation angle greater the
elevation angle, the greater the pressure exerted on the flow of blood from a
peripheral vein to the heart (MY Liaw, 1989; Wulandari, 2015; Starkey, 2004;
Sherwood, 2015). Elevation angle of 30 ° provides a higher pressure than the
elevation using a pillow. Another factor is the ability to support the foot
ERLESS more stable than the pillow.
- The different effect on the elevation angle of 30 ° group and the control group c ircumference edema.
On the influence of different test results there are differences in the
effect. The average value of albumin, a group of 30 ° is 3:05 mg / dL in the
control group 3:07 mg / dL. On multivariate testing against confounding
variables, that the value of albumin in this study effect of 32% to the
decrease edema circumference measurement. Albumin is a plasma protein
that forms the osmotic gradient between the blood and interstitial fluid. The
existence of albumin can inhibit overproduction of plasma from the capillaries
into the liquid insterstisium enabling it to maintain plasma volume (Sherwood,
2015).
Differences between groups of 30 ° with the control group except albumin
factors caused by differences in elevation angle. Angle of 90 ° provides the
gravitational force of 100%, while at an angle of 30 ° gives the force of
gravity 71%. If at a 90 ° angle effect will put pressure on the venous blood
flow by 90 ° bottom mmHg, then by 30 ° elevation will put pressure toward the
heart by 90 mm Hg x 71% = 63.9 mmHg (Starkey, 2004).
During the procedure of elevation,
the client in a state lie back and relax, as a result of relaxed breathing
becomes irregular activity. According to Sherwood (2015) due to respiratory
activity of pressure in the chest cavity average of 5 mmHg below atmospheric
pressure. This pressure difference squeeze blood from veins in the lower part
toward the chest veins, thereby increasing venous return. Conditions were
comfortable reclining clients during the procedure of elevation, may account
for the increased venous return. Resting conditions make the heart's
normal rate is in the range of 60-100 beats / min. Normal heart pumps provide
the charging effects and effective cardiac output. The right atrial
pressure under normal conditions is below zero or below atmospheric pressure.
In situations like this the heart has the ability to suck the blood that will
go into the right atrium and venous return becomes faster (Hall, 2014).
Elevation maximize venous drainage and lowers capillary pressure and postural
changes dielevasikan legs will increase venous flow inside and reduce pressure
on the veins (FP Dix, 2005).
- ERLESS use your influence on client convenience DFU
In the test user comfort ERLESS elevation angle of 30 ° p
value was 0.005. Previous research has for the comfort of the most recommended
angle is 30 °, and performed for 30 minutes (Liaw, 1989; Collins & Seraj,
2010) Convenience is a condition basic needs will be calm. According Kolcaba
improve the comfort of clients defined if nurses provide strength, support and
assistance of entertainment expectations (Alligood, 2014). Clients expressed
convenient if the nurse is able to free from pain, and avoid injury. The risk
of injury is prevented by design powerful and robust tool equipped with a
fastener on any part of either foot lower leg, knee and thigh. Pain is also a
significant threat to the comfort of the client. The cause of pain in DFU
according Wulandari (2015) is the pressure that occurs in the wound. Therapy
elevation causes the pressure on the wound will be reduced, the pressure drop
will reduce the sensation of pain to the client. ERLESS expensive material
comfort soft leather is able to reduce the pressure interface with the
results of stress tests interface average 31.88 mmHg.
- ERLESS function.
In ERLESS function measurements obtained significant
results. It is influenced by several factors one of which conducted trials
ERLESS before installation on the client. The trials comfort tools to
demonstrate the value of reliability Cronbach alpha of 0.730. The trial
shows the value of reliability function ERLESS 0643. Both questionnaires have
high reliability. The test results showed a 100% security tools do not cause
injury, did not cause a new wound, do not add injury, appropriate size of the
foot, and was able to arrange a 30 ° angle test result of pressure ulcer
secure tool against the risk of pressure ulcers by pressure interface
average of 31.88 mmHg. Another factor is a design created to consider the strength,
comfortable material and practical tools to be used.
CONCLUSION
Based
on the research results can be concluded:
- Respondent characteristics such as age, albumin, old wounds and history of diabetes affect the circumference edema.
- There are significant differences measurements of circumference edema before and after elevation using the elevation group ERLESS at 30 ° and the control group. The treatment group had an average reduction in circumference edema greater than the control group.
- There is significant influence ERLESS and elevation using a pillow against the circumference edema . Group 30 ° more effectively decrease the circumference edema when compared to controls .
- There is the influence of elevation using E RLESS to client comfort at an angle of elevation of 30 ° . Elevation angle of 30 ° is felt more comfortable for clients compared with a pillow
- Elevation of 30 ° using ERLESS significantly influence ERLESS function.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Aalaa, M., Malazy, OT, Sanjari, M., & Peimani, M. (2012). Nurses'
role in prevention and care of diabetic foot ; a review, 1-6.
Alligood, MR (2014). Nursing Theorists and Their Work (Eigth). St.
Louis, Missouri: Mosby Elsevier Inc. and, inc. Retrieved from www.elsevier.com
and www.bookaid.org
Armstrong, DG, & Lipsky, BA (2005). Preventing Foot Ulcers, 293
(2), 217-228.
Brodovicz, KG, McNaughton, K., Uemura, N., Meininger, G., Girman, CJ,
& Yale, SH (2009). Reliability and feasibility of methods to quantitatively
assess peripheral edema. Clinical Medicine & Research , 7
(1-2), 21-31. http://doi.org/10.3121/cmr.2009.819
Byung, H., & Young, HL (2010). Angging and Arterial stiffness. J.Circulation
Society , 74 , 2257-2262. Retrieved from http://www.j-circ.or.jp
Collins, L., & Seraj, S. (2010). Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous
Ulcers, 81 (8), 989-996.
Ely, JW, Osheroff JA, Chambliss, ML, & Ebell, MH (2006). Approach to
Leg Edema of Unclear etiology. The Journal of the American Board of Family
Medicine , 19 (2), 148-160. http://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.19.2.148
FP Dix. (2005). Effect of leg elevation on healing. South Manchester:
Sage Journal. Phlebology. Retrieved from
http://phl.sagepub.com/content/20/2/87.abstract
Hall, GA and. (2014). Textbook of Medical Physiology. Jakarta: EGC.
Herdman, TH, & Kamitsuru, S. (2014). NANDA INTERNATIONAL NURSING
DIAGNOSES: Definitions and Classification 2015-2017 . Igarss 2014
(Tenth). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
Hidayat, A. (2000). The influence of age, Diabetes Mellitus and
Hypertension to the occurrence of wound infections after Transvesikal
prostatectomy. Faculty of Medicine, University of Diponegoro in Semarang.
Retrieved from http // www. eprint.undip.ac.id.thesis.
Ho, TK, Leigh, RD, & Tsui, J. (2013). The British Journal of Diabetes
& Vascular Disease Diabetic foot disease and edema. The British Journal
of Diabetes & Vascular Disease , 13: 45 .
http://doi.org/10.1177/1474651412472213
Irawati, L. (2010). Blood viscosity and its medical aspect. Andalas
Medical Magazine No. 2 Vol. 34 , 102-111.
Jeyakhanthan, B. (2006). The reliability of Foot and Ankle Water
Volumemetry. Aucland .: Thesis: Master of Health Science Auckland University of
Technology.
Kawasaki, T. (2013). The effect of different positions on lower limbs
skin perfusion pressure. Indian J Plast Surg. 2013 Sep-Dec.
http://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.121995
Kogo, H., Higashi, T., & Murata, J. (2015). Reliability of a new
practical evaluation method for pitting edema based on the depth of the surface
imprint. J.Phiys Ther.Sci , 27 , 1735-1738.
Kozier. (2011). Textbook Fundamentals of Nursing: Concepts, Process
and Practice, Translators Widiarti. Jakarta: EGC.
Legare, S., Gammal, C., Hall, E., & Horwitz, R. (2007). A Device
for Measuring the Severity of Peripheral edema . WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC
INSTITUTE.
MY Liaw, WM (1989). The effects of leg edema leg elevation to reduce the
resulting from prolonged standing. PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE.
http://doi.org/2794965
Monnet, X., Richard, C., & Teboul, J. (2015). Passive Leg Raising
Hemodynamic Effects of Passive Leg Raising. J.Biomed Central Paris , 19
(18), 543-548.
Mora. (2002). The role of pulsatile cold compression in ankle fractures
edema following resolution: a randomized clinical trial. Foot Ankle Int
, 23 , 999-1002.
Nabuurs-Franssen, AMH, & Kruseman, N. (2005). Health-related quality
of life of diabetic foot ulcers Patients and their caregivers. Diabetologia
, 1906-1910. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-005-1856-6
National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, EPUAP and PPPIA (2014). Prevention
and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers : Quick Reference Guide . (. Emily
Haesler, Ed.). Perth, Australia: Cambridge Media.
Paul, Chadwick, M Edmonds, J McCardle, AD (2013). International Best
Practice Guidelines : Wound Management in Diabetic Foot Ulcers. Wounds
International . London: Wounds International ,. Retrieved from
http://www.woundsinternational.com/clinical-guidelines/best-practice-guidelines-wound-management-in-diabetic-foot-ulcers
Rebolledo, FA, Soto, JMT, Escobedo, J., & Peña, D. (2011). The
Pathogenesis of the Diabetic Foot Ulcer : Prevention and Management. Global
Perspective on Diabetic Foot ulcerations , 155-178.
Sherwood, L. (2015). Human physiology of cells to the system (8th
ed.). Jakarta: EGC.
Simon, EB (2014). Leg Edema Assessment and Management, 23 (1).
Sims, AND (1986). Effects of Positioning on Ankle Edema, 0-4.
Chad Starkey. (2004). Therapeutic Modalities . (C. Frantantoro,
Ed.) (3rd ed.). Philadelphia .: FA Davis Company.
Supriya, Nishizawa, T. Fukuda, M., Kon, Y., Junko, M., Suriadi, ...
Hiromi, S. (2014). Interface pressure, pressure gradient with pressure ulcer
development in Intensive Care Units. Journal of Nursing Education and
Practice.www.sciedu.ca/jnep , 4 (9), 146-154.
http://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v4n9p146
Veves, A., Giurini, JM, & Logerfo, FW (2006). The Diabetic Foot
(Second). New Jersey: Humana Press.
Villeco, JP, & Otr, L. (2012). edema : A Silent but Important Factor.
Journal of Hand Therapy , 25 (2), 153-162.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2011.09.008
Wulandari, I. (2015). Lower extremities elevation influence the healing
process DFU. Scientific Journal of Nursing STIKES Hang Tuah Surabaya. , 3
.
Yazdanpanah, L., Nasiri, M., & Adarvishi, S. (2015). Literature
review on the management of diabetic foot ulcers, 6 (1), 37-53.
http://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v6.i1.37
Yoga, USA (2013). Design Tools Portable Foot Holder for childbirth. Yogyakarta:
Thesis. Department of Industrial Engineering Faculty of Industrial Technology,
University of Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.
Yotsu, RR (2014). Comparison of characteristics and course of healing of
diabetic foot ulcers by etiological classification: Neuropathic, ischemic, and
neuro-ischemic type. Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications , Vol.28
(4) , 28; 528-535. http://doi.org/10.1016